Sunday, December 30, 2012

ARTICLEs & MATERIALs

My LIBRARY

You can visit for your further extension information...
Enjoy & Thanks.. :)

Becoming an Interpreter - Mrs. Sri Nurhayati, S.Pd, M.Pd
Careers in Interpreting
ESP - INDONESIA EDUCATION ACT of NATIONAL EDUCATION SYSTEM
GRAMMAR - Essential Grammar in Use Supplementary Exercise - Helen Naylor
GRAMMAR in Use - Raymond Murphy
Writing in Professional Contexts - Mrs Anita Anggraeni, S.Sos, M.Pd



MORPHOSYNTAX


1. MORPHEME

Definition
Morpheme is the smallest linguistic unit within a word that can carry a meaning.
  1. Types of morphemes
  • Free morphemes, is morpheme which can appear with other lexemes (i.e Town+Hall= Town Hall) or they can stand alone (i.e Town).
  • Bound morphemes is morpheme which appear only together with other morphemes to form a lexeme (i.e un-, im-, -ly, etc). Bound morphemes in general tend to be prefixes and suffixes. Unproductive, non-affix morphemes that exist only in bound form are known as “cranberry” morphemes, from the “cran” in that very word.
  • Derivational morphemes is morpheme which can be added to a word to create (derive) another word: the addition of “-ness” to “happy,” for example, to give “happiness.” They carry semantic information.
  • Inflectional morphemes is morpheme which modify a word’s tense, number, aspect, and so on, without deriving a new word or a word in a new grammatical category (as in the “dog” morpheme if written with the plural marker morpheme “-s” becomes “dogs”). They carry grammatical information.
  • Allomorph is variants of a morpheme, e.g., the plural marker in English is sometimes realized as /-z/, /-s/ or /-ɨz/.
Example of Morpheme: The word “unbreakable” has three morphemes: ü  “un-“, a bound morpheme;
ü  “break“, a free morpheme; and
ü  “-able“, a bound morpheme.
(“un-” is also a prefix, “-able” is a suffix. Both “un-” and “-able” are affixes.)
ü  The morpheme plural -s has the morph “-s“, /s/, in cats (/kæts/), but “-es“, /ɨz/, in dishes (/dɪʃɨz/), and even the voiced “-s”, /z/, in dogs (/dɒɡz/). “-s”. These are allomorphs.


2. PHONEME

Definition
Phoneme is one of a small set of speech sounds that are distinguished by the speakers of a particular language). In a language or dialect, a phoneme is the smallest segmental unit of sound employed to form meaningful contrasts between utterances.
Thus a phoneme is a group of slightly different sounds which are all perceived to have the same function by speakers of the language or dialect in question.

1. Types of Phoneme

1. Restricted phonemes

A restricted phoneme is a phoneme that can only occur in a certain environment: There are restrictions as to where it can occur. English has several restricted phonemes:
  • /ŋ/, as in sing, occurs only at the end of a syllable, never at the beginning (in many other languages, such as Swahili or Thai, /ŋ/ can appear word-initially).
  • /h/ occurs only before vowels and at the beginning of a syllable, never at the end (a few languages, such as Arabic, or Romanian allow /h/ syllable-finally).
  • In many American dialects with the cot-caught merger, /ɔ/ occurs only before /r/, /l/, and in the diphthong /ɔɪ/.
  • In non-rhotic dialects, /r/ can only occur before a vowel, never at the end of a word or before a consonant.
  • Under most interpretations, /w/ and /j/ occur only before a vowel, never at the end of a syllable. However, many phonologists interpret a word like boy as either /bɔɪ/ or /bɔj/.

2. Biuniqueness

Biuniqueness is a property of the phoneme in classic structuralist phonemics. The biuniqueness definition states that every phonetic allophone must unambiguously be assigned to one and only one phoneme. In other words, there is a many-to-one allophone-to-phoneme mapping instead of a many-to-many mapping.
The unworkable aspects of the concept soon become apparent if you consider the phenomenon of flapping in North American English. In the right environment, this flapping can change either /t/ or /d/ into the allophone [ɾ] for many affected speakers. Here, one allophone is clearly assigned to two phonemes.

3. Neutralization, archiphoneme, underspecification

Phonemes that are contrastive in certain environments may not be contrastive in all environments. In the environments where they don’t contrast, the contrast is said to be neutralized.
In English there are three nasal phonemes, /m, n, ŋ/, as shown by the minimal triplet,
/sʌm/ sum
/sʌn/ sun
/sʌŋ/ sung
With rare exceptions, these phonemes are not contrastive before plosives such as /p, t, k/ within the same morpheme. Although all three phones appear before plosives, for example in limp, lint, link, only one of these may appear before each of the plosives. That is, the /m, n, ŋ/ distinction is neutralized before each of the plosives /p, t, k/:
  • Only /m/ occurs before /p/,
  • only /n/ before /t/, and
  • only /ŋ/ before /k/.
Thus these phonemes are not contrastive in these environments, and according to some theorists, there is no evidence as to what the underlying representation might be. If we hypothesize that we are dealing with only a single underlying nasal, there is no reason to pick one of the three phonemes /m, n, ŋ/ over the other two.
(In some languages there is only one phonemic nasal anywhere, and due to obligatory assimilation, it surfaces as [m, n, ŋ] in just these environments, so this idea is not as far-fetched as it might seem at first glance.)
In certain schools of phonology, such a neutralized distinction is known as an archiphoneme (Nikolai Trubetzkoy of the Prague school is often associated with this analysis). Archiphonemes are often notated with a capital letter. Following this convention, the neutralization of /m, n, ŋ/ before /p, t, k/ could be notated as |N|, and limp, lint, link would be represented as |lɪNp, lɪNt, lɪNk|. (The |pipes| indicate underlying representation.) Other ways this archiphoneme could be notated are |m-n-ŋ|, {m, n, ŋ}, or |n*|.
Another example from American English is the neutralization of the plosives /t, d/ following a stressed syllable. Phonetically, both are realized in this position as [ɾ], a voiced alveolar flap. This can be heard by comparing betting with bedding.
[bɛt] bet
[bɛd] bed
with the suffix -ing:
[ˈbɛɾɪŋ] betting
[ˈbɛɾɪŋ] bedding
Thus, one cannot say whether the underlying representation of the intervocalic consonant in either word is /t/ or /d/ without looking at the unsuffixed form. This neutralization can be represented as an archiphoneme |D|, in which case the underlying representation of betting or bedding could be |ˈbɛDɪŋ|.
Another way to talk about archiphonemes involves the concept of underspecification.
Underspecification: phonemes can be considered fully specified segments while archiphonemes are underspecified segments. In Tuvan, phonemic vowels are specified with the articulatory features of tongue height, backness, and lip rounding. The archiphoneme |U| is an underspecified high vowel where only the tongue height is specified.
phoneme/
archiphoneme
height backness roundedness
/i/ high front unrounded
/ɯ/ high back unrounded
/u/ high back rounded
|U| high

Whether |U| is pronounced as front or back and whether rounded or unrounded depends on vowel harmony. If |U| occurs following a front unrounded vowel, it will be pronounced as the phoneme /i/; if following a back unrounded vowel, it will be as an /ɯ/; and if following a back rounded vowel, it will be an /u/. This can been seen in the following words:
-|Um|

‘my’ (the vowel of this suffix is underspecified)
|idikUm| [idikim] ‘my boot’ (/i/ is front & unrounded)
|xarUm| [xarɯm] ‘my snow’ (/a/ is back & unrounded)
|nomUm| [nomum] ‘my book’ (/o/ is back & rounded)

Examples of phonemes in the English language include consonant plosives like /p/ and /b/. These two are most often written consistently with one letter for each sound. These phonemes, however, might not be so apparent in written English, for example when they are typically represented by a group of more than one letter, called a digraph, like <sh> (pronounced /ʃ/) or <ch> (pronounced /tʃ/).
Two sounds which are allophones (sound variants belonging to the same phoneme) in one language may belong to separate phonemes in another language or dialect. In English, for example, /p/ has aspirated and non-aspirated allophones:aspirated as in /pɪn/, and non-aspirated as in /spɪn/. However, in many languages (e. g. Chinese), aspirated /pʰ/ is a phoneme distinct from unaspirated /p/. As another example, there is no distinction between [r] and [l] in Japanese: there is only one /r/ phoneme, though it has various allophones that can sound more like [l], [ɾ], or [r] to English speakers. The sounds [z] and [s] are distinct phonemes in English, but allophones in some variants of Spanish like ‘andaluz’. The sounds [n] (as in run) and [ŋ] (as in rung) are also sometimes considered phonemes in English, but allophones in Italian and Spanish.
An important phoneme is the chroneme, a phonemically-relevant extension of the duration of a consonant or vowel. Some languages or dialects such as Finnish or Japanese allow chronemes after both consonants and vowels. Others, like Australian English use it after only one (in the case of Australian, vowels).

Source: erwin1988zone.wordpress.com 

Foundation of English for Specific Purposes (ESP)

ESP is an approach to language teaching in which all decisions as to content and method are based on the learners for teaching.

Curriculum is set of plans and regulations about the aims, content, and material of lessons and the method employed as the guidelines for the implementation of learning activities to achieve given education objectives.

Syllabus is a guidance for writing lesson plan includes identity of subject matters, or thematic subject matters, standards of competence (SK), basic competence (KD), learning materials, learning activities, indicator of achievement of competencies, assessment, allocation of time, and learning resources.

Lesson plan is a teacher's detailed description of the course of instruction for one class. A daily lesson plan is develop by a teacher to guide class instruction.

Character building id education of value, education of moral, and education that aims to develop the students' ability to decide a good-bad decisions, maintain which is good and implemented it in their life.

The Aims of National Education
(Based on Statue No.20 of 2003, Article 3)
The National Education functions to develop the capability, character, and civilization of the nation for enhancing its intellectual capacity, and is aimed at developing learners' potentials so that they become persons imbued with human value who are faithful and pious to one and only God; who possess morals and noble character; who are healthy, knowledgeable, competent, creative, independent, and as citizens, are democratic and responsible.




Questions
1.      There are three main reason common the emergence of all ESP. mention them clearly!
2.      Why was ESP introduced in your country or teaching in institution? What kind of ESP are taught?
3.    All language teaching should be based on learner’s need. In theory, there’s no difference between ESP and general English teaching. In practice, however, there’s a great deal of difference. How far would you agree with this statement? What is the difference, either in theory or in practice? Do you think there are?
4.       Explain clearly in details the factors affecting ESP course design!
5.    ESP is an approach lo language teaching in which all decision as to content and method are based on the learner’s reason for learning. What do you think of this? Describe your argument clearly!

Answers
1.      Three main reasons common to the emergence of all ESP:
1)    The demands of a Brave New World.
The end of the Second World War in 1945 heralded an age of enormous and unprecedented expansion in scientific, technical, and economic activity on an International scale. This expansion created a world unified and dominated by two forces (technology and commerce) which in their relentless progress soon generated a demand for an International language. For various reason, most notably the economic power of the United States in the post-war world. This role fell to English.
2)    A revolution in linguistics.
At the same time as the demand was growing for English courses tailored to specific needs, influential new ideas began to emerge in the study of language. Traditionally the aim of linguistics had been to describe the rules of English usage that is the Grammar. However, the new studies shifted attention away from defining the formal features of language usage to discovering the ways in which language is actually used in real communication.
3)    Focus on the learner.
New developments in educational psychology also contributed to the rise of ESP, by emphasizing the central importance of learners and their attitudes to learning (e.g. Rodgers, 1969). Learners were seen to have different needs and interests, which would have an important influence on their motivation to learn and therefore on the effectiveness of their learning.

2.   Because ESP is so important, the growth of ESP was brought about by a combination of three important factors;
1)    The expansion of demand for English to suit particular needs,
2)    Developments in the fields of linguistics, and
3)    Educational psychology.
All the three factors seemed to point towards the need for increased specialization in language learning.

Kinds of ESP that taught in our country are:
1.       English for Science and Technology (EST)
a.       English for Academic Purposes (EAP): English for Medical Studies
b.      English for Occupational Purposes (EOP): English for Technicians
2.       English for Business and Economics (EBE)
a.       English for Economics
b.      English for Secretaries
3.       English for Social Sciences (ESS)
a.       English for Psychology
b.      English for Teaching

3.   I think there are some differences between ESP and general English teaching. ESP must be seen as an approach not as a product. ESP is not a particular kind of language or methodology, nor does it consist of a particular type of teaching material. It is an approach to language learning, which is based on learner needs. The foundation of all ESP is the simple question: “Why does this learner need to learn foreign language?” from this question will flow a whole host of further questions, some of which will relate to the learner themselves, some to the nature of the language the learners will need to operate, some to the given learning context. But, this whole analysis derives from an initial identified need on the part of the learner to learn language.

4.

Factors affecting course design are:
·         Why does student need to learn?
·         Who is going to be involved in the process? This will need to cover not just the student, but all the people who may have some effect on the process; teachers, sponsors, inspectors, etc.
·         Where is the learning to take place? What potential does the place provide? What limitations does it impose?
·         When is the learning take place? How much time is available? How it will be distributed?
·         What does the student need to learn? What aspect of language will be needed and how they will be described? What level of proficiency must be achieved? What topic areas will need to be covered?
·         How the learning will be achieved? What learning theory with underlie the course? What kind of methodology will be employed?

5.    I agree about that. ESP (English for Specific Purposes) is a How to teach English language to learner, but based on the learner’s need. An ESP program is therefore built on an assessment of purposes and needs and the functions for which English is required. I mean is what the learners want to learn, what the purpose they learn English for, etc. ESP is an approach to learn English more specific, not for common English. ESP students are usually have some acquaintance with English and are learning the language in order to communicate a set of professional skills and to perform particular job-related functions.